• posted a message on Fantasy Football Advice
    Quote from TheMaddenGuru24 >>
    Quote from deweydecimaled >>
    Quote from TheMaddenGuru24 >>
    Quote from deweydecimaled >>
    Quote from TheMaddenGuru24 >>
    Quote from deweydecimaled >>
    Quote from TheMaddenGuru24 >>
    Quote from deweydecimaled >>
    Quote from TheMaddenGuru24 >>
    Quote from deweydecimaled >>
    Quote from TheMaddenGuru24 >>
    Quote from DarkPassenger >>
    Quote from TheMaddenGuru24 >>
    Quote from DarkPassenger >>

    I dont think Williams was a bad pick, but for his ADP...people were really overvaluing him. No way should he have been touched in the first 50 picks. Hes still a 50% touch guy in an explosive offense so he has value but he was never gonna be the RB1 some thought hed be.

     Williams was far from a bad pick back before McCoy came to KC. Dude would have clearly gotten the lions share without him there. Granted, it does look like McCoy seems to be in the doghouse right about now after all the fumbles. So we'll see how that goes.

     If he was taken in the top 50, I think he was a bad pick.

     With McCoy sure, without him, he would have gotten all the carries he's gotten this season, plus 98% of the ones McCoy has gotten. It's clear Darrel and Thompson are non factors currently.  Certainly far from a bad pick in the top 50 if it wasn't for McCoy imo. That's the first 4-5 rounds. 

     they'll use darrel a fair amount if either damien or mccoy goes down, which is what they have already done this season.

     

    there's no foreseeable situation in which damien williams will get around 80% of carries in this offense, mccoy or no mccoy. so no, damien will not get 98% of mccoy's carries if mccoy misses a game. damien will not get a "dalvin cook workload" or whatever you said. you have a real bad read on this offense but I think it's just so you feel like less of a bad NFL football prognosticator. 

     You can simply knock it off with the petty insults dude. I'm getting tired of it.

     

    Before McCoy came onto the scene, Reid mentioned he was going to run a committee similar to the one he used in Philly (we've heard this before, right). In that committee, there was one main back who got the majority of carries, with other backs serving as supporting roles. Damien is no star, but Darrel Williams is straight up backup material, and Thompson is still getting his feet wet. This is not the case for McCoy, and Reid's plans obviously changed. Williams outpaced McCoy in carries these past two weeks 19 to 12, and was on the field this past week for 72% of offensive snaps compared to McCoy's 10%. But at the same time, McCoy received the majority in week 6, 50% to 38%. There is clearly not a main back in this backfield like there would have been without McCoy. Williams was also signed to an extension last year, so they definitely intended on using him. Keep in mind that he was clearly the main back last year at the end when McCoy wasn't there. Overall, there is very much evidence that he could have gotten a large workload would McCoy have not joined the team just as much as there is evidence that it would have been more balanced. So we can agree to disagree, but you simply can't come out here and say that there is no way that it would have happened. To be honest, I'm at fault for acting like it definitely would have happened above as well. None of us truly know, or will ever know. But I don't need you questioning or critiquing my overall football knowledge, thank you.

     a) Oh no!

     

    b) You're right - you don't need me questioning or critiquing your overall football knowledge, because you've been spewing bad take after bad take since August. 

     

    Find me one other person in the world who thinks Damien Williams would have gotten a "Dalvin Cook workload" without McCoy on the roster. I'll wait.

     

     You know what's funny is, you keep talking about how Darrel and Darwin are "backup material" like Damien is just soooo much better than they are. Is that why Damien has been a backup his entire career?

     I don't care what you say anymore man. I'm perfectly fine with having a debate with someone who can carry an adult, mature conversation, but when someone resorts to petty insults that all goes out the window. Your opinion means nothing to me when you can't say it without needlessly trashing me. And you've gotten just as much wrong as I have, so don't act like you're the king of fantasy football. That RB you said was going to cut into Montgomery's carries? Got cut this week. What are Dante Pettis's numbers again? Didn't someone try to tell you he wasn't the WR1 anymore? Consider yourself ceremoniously blocked, because I'm done arguing with you. Waste of my time, waste of yours, waste of everyone else's. Moving on.

     lol you are out of your mind. completely.

    you have been nonstop terrible take after terrible take.

     

    i said montgomery had a high likelihood of being a bust because mike davis was going to rob touches from him.

    and hey guess what, thats exactly what happened. montgomery was a 4th rounder.

     

    and you said dante pettis WAS GOING TO BE CUT lol

    of all the players i hyped up this summer you will find me mentioning pettis exactly zero times

     

    you are one sad mofo man.....

     I said he COULD get cut. At least get it right if you're going to continue to take needless shots at me. Also, Montgomery is picking up pace. He's the only rosterable player on that offense at this point in standard leagues. You're calling me sad? You're bullying a random guy on the internet, for what, fun? To make you feel better about yourself? Don't care, I'm done with it. 

     what's this, the third time you're done arguing in the last 24 hours?

     

    you say ignorant sht and you will get called for it. you know, sht like, damien williams is an RB1 i will shout it from the rooftops, damien williams would have a dalvin cook workload if mccoy wasnt on the roster, dante pettis is going to get cut, and about a zillion other things in the last few months.

     

    since my takes are just as bad as yours, why dont you go back and find some of the things ive said that were wrong and quote them here... when i get about 4 hours of free time i'll do the same for your garbage ass takes... im sure this will work out just great for you

     You act as if you've never gotten anything wrong and I'm sick of it. I make bold takes for a reason and don't care if they're wrong. You seem to not be able to grasp that. Leave me alone, or you'll be the first member here I ever block, and then you won't be able to get your glorious satisfaction of trashing me. Choice is up to you.

     look dude, you are more caught up in your feelings than most women i know. 

     

    you take shots and take shots then you turn into a little btch when you get your BS debunked.

     

    why dont you just do as i suggested, go back and quote me on all the takes i got wrong, or is this just more BS that you said that you cant back up?

     

    yep same old guru playbook. take a bunch of shots, then whine about how you're being attacked

     

    you're a joke, bozo

     I know internet trolls when I see it. You can't even admit that you don't act like a know it all lol. I should have known better with the crap you used to pull, when someone PMed me saying you were nothing but an instigator with a bad mood. Bye. 

     Edited

    Posted in: Sports Discussion
  • posted a message on Fantasy Football Advice
    Quote from TheMaddenGuru24 >>
    Quote from deweydecimaled >>
    Quote from TheMaddenGuru24 >>
    Quote from deweydecimaled >>
    Quote from TheMaddenGuru24 >>
    Quote from deweydecimaled >>
    Quote from TheMaddenGuru24 >>
    Quote from deweydecimaled >>
    Quote from TheMaddenGuru24 >>
    Quote from DarkPassenger >>
    Quote from TheMaddenGuru24 >>
    Quote from DarkPassenger >>

    I dont think Williams was a bad pick, but for his ADP...people were really overvaluing him. No way should he have been touched in the first 50 picks. Hes still a 50% touch guy in an explosive offense so he has value but he was never gonna be the RB1 some thought hed be.

     Williams was far from a bad pick back before McCoy came to KC. Dude would have clearly gotten the lions share without him there. Granted, it does look like McCoy seems to be in the doghouse right about now after all the fumbles. So we'll see how that goes.

     If he was taken in the top 50, I think he was a bad pick.

     With McCoy sure, without him, he would have gotten all the carries he's gotten this season, plus 98% of the ones McCoy has gotten. It's clear Darrel and Thompson are non factors currently.  Certainly far from a bad pick in the top 50 if it wasn't for McCoy imo. That's the first 4-5 rounds. 

     they'll use darrel a fair amount if either damien or mccoy goes down, which is what they have already done this season.

     

    there's no foreseeable situation in which damien williams will get around 80% of carries in this offense, mccoy or no mccoy. so no, damien will not get 98% of mccoy's carries if mccoy misses a game. damien will not get a "dalvin cook workload" or whatever you said. you have a real bad read on this offense but I think it's just so you feel like less of a bad NFL football prognosticator. 

     You can simply knock it off with the petty insults dude. I'm getting tired of it.

     

    Before McCoy came onto the scene, Reid mentioned he was going to run a committee similar to the one he used in Philly (we've heard this before, right). In that committee, there was one main back who got the majority of carries, with other backs serving as supporting roles. Damien is no star, but Darrel Williams is straight up backup material, and Thompson is still getting his feet wet. This is not the case for McCoy, and Reid's plans obviously changed. Williams outpaced McCoy in carries these past two weeks 19 to 12, and was on the field this past week for 72% of offensive snaps compared to McCoy's 10%. But at the same time, McCoy received the majority in week 6, 50% to 38%. There is clearly not a main back in this backfield like there would have been without McCoy. Williams was also signed to an extension last year, so they definitely intended on using him. Keep in mind that he was clearly the main back last year at the end when McCoy wasn't there. Overall, there is very much evidence that he could have gotten a large workload would McCoy have not joined the team just as much as there is evidence that it would have been more balanced. So we can agree to disagree, but you simply can't come out here and say that there is no way that it would have happened. To be honest, I'm at fault for acting like it definitely would have happened above as well. None of us truly know, or will ever know. But I don't need you questioning or critiquing my overall football knowledge, thank you.

     a) Oh no!

     

    b) You're right - you don't need me questioning or critiquing your overall football knowledge, because you've been spewing bad take after bad take since August. 

     

    Find me one other person in the world who thinks Damien Williams would have gotten a "Dalvin Cook workload" without McCoy on the roster. I'll wait.

     

     You know what's funny is, you keep talking about how Darrel and Darwin are "backup material" like Damien is just soooo much better than they are. Is that why Damien has been a backup his entire career?

     I don't care what you say anymore man. I'm perfectly fine with having a debate with someone who can carry an adult, mature conversation, but when someone resorts to petty insults that all goes out the window. Your opinion means nothing to me when you can't say it without needlessly trashing me. And you've gotten just as much wrong as I have, so don't act like you're the king of fantasy football. That RB you said was going to cut into Montgomery's carries? Got cut this week. What are Dante Pettis's numbers again? Didn't someone try to tell you he wasn't the WR1 anymore? Consider yourself ceremoniously blocked, because I'm done arguing with you. Waste of my time, waste of yours, waste of everyone else's. Moving on.

     lol you are out of your mind. completely.

    you have been nonstop terrible take after terrible take.

     

    i said montgomery had a high likelihood of being a bust because mike davis was going to rob touches from him.

    and hey guess what, thats exactly what happened. montgomery was a 4th rounder.

     

    and you said dante pettis WAS GOING TO BE CUT lol

    of all the players i hyped up this summer you will find me mentioning pettis exactly zero times

     

    you are one sad mofo man.....

     I said he COULD get cut. At least get it right if you're going to continue to take needless shots at me. Also, Montgomery is picking up pace. He's the only rosterable player on that offense at this point in standard leagues. You're calling me sad? You're bullying a random guy on the internet, for what, fun? To make you feel better about yourself? Don't care, I'm done with it. 

     what's this, the third time you're done arguing in the last 24 hours?

     

    you say ignorant sht and you will get called for it. you know, sht like, damien williams is an RB1 i will shout it from the rooftops, damien williams would have a dalvin cook workload if mccoy wasnt on the roster, dante pettis is going to get cut, and about a zillion other things in the last few months.

     

    since my takes are just as bad as yours, why dont you go back and find some of the things ive said that were wrong and quote them here... when i get about 4 hours of free time i'll do the same for your garbage ass takes... im sure this will work out just great for you

     You act as if you've never gotten anything wrong and I'm sick of it. I make bold takes for a reason and don't care if they're wrong. You seem to not be able to grasp that. Leave me alone, or you'll be the first member here I ever block, and then you won't be able to get your glorious satisfaction of trashing me. Choice is up to you.

     look dude, you are more caught up in your feelings than most women i know. 

     

    you take shots and take shots then you turn into a little btch when you get your BS debunked.

     

    why dont you just do as i suggested, go back and quote me on all the takes i got wrong, or is this just more BS that you said that you cant back up?

     

    yep same old guru playbook. take a bunch of shots, then whine about how you're being attacked

     

    you're a joke, bozo

    Posted in: Sports Discussion
  • posted a message on Fantasy Football Advice

    .

    Posted in: Sports Discussion
  • posted a message on Fantasy Football Advice
    Quote from TheMaddenGuru24 >>
    Quote from deweydecimaled >>
    Quote from TheMaddenGuru24 >>
    Quote from deweydecimaled >>
    Quote from TheMaddenGuru24 >>
    Quote from deweydecimaled >>
    Quote from TheMaddenGuru24 >>
    Quote from DarkPassenger >>
    Quote from TheMaddenGuru24 >>
    Quote from DarkPassenger >>

    I dont think Williams was a bad pick, but for his ADP...people were really overvaluing him. No way should he have been touched in the first 50 picks. Hes still a 50% touch guy in an explosive offense so he has value but he was never gonna be the RB1 some thought hed be.

     Williams was far from a bad pick back before McCoy came to KC. Dude would have clearly gotten the lions share without him there. Granted, it does look like McCoy seems to be in the doghouse right about now after all the fumbles. So we'll see how that goes.

     If he was taken in the top 50, I think he was a bad pick.

     With McCoy sure, without him, he would have gotten all the carries he's gotten this season, plus 98% of the ones McCoy has gotten. It's clear Darrel and Thompson are non factors currently.  Certainly far from a bad pick in the top 50 if it wasn't for McCoy imo. That's the first 4-5 rounds. 

     they'll use darrel a fair amount if either damien or mccoy goes down, which is what they have already done this season.

     

    there's no foreseeable situation in which damien williams will get around 80% of carries in this offense, mccoy or no mccoy. so no, damien will not get 98% of mccoy's carries if mccoy misses a game. damien will not get a "dalvin cook workload" or whatever you said. you have a real bad read on this offense but I think it's just so you feel like less of a bad NFL football prognosticator. 

     You can simply knock it off with the petty insults dude. I'm getting tired of it.

     

    Before McCoy came onto the scene, Reid mentioned he was going to run a committee similar to the one he used in Philly (we've heard this before, right). In that committee, there was one main back who got the majority of carries, with other backs serving as supporting roles. Damien is no star, but Darrel Williams is straight up backup material, and Thompson is still getting his feet wet. This is not the case for McCoy, and Reid's plans obviously changed. Williams outpaced McCoy in carries these past two weeks 19 to 12, and was on the field this past week for 72% of offensive snaps compared to McCoy's 10%. But at the same time, McCoy received the majority in week 6, 50% to 38%. There is clearly not a main back in this backfield like there would have been without McCoy. Williams was also signed to an extension last year, so they definitely intended on using him. Keep in mind that he was clearly the main back last year at the end when McCoy wasn't there. Overall, there is very much evidence that he could have gotten a large workload would McCoy have not joined the team just as much as there is evidence that it would have been more balanced. So we can agree to disagree, but you simply can't come out here and say that there is no way that it would have happened. To be honest, I'm at fault for acting like it definitely would have happened above as well. None of us truly know, or will ever know. But I don't need you questioning or critiquing my overall football knowledge, thank you.

     a) Oh no!

     

    b) You're right - you don't need me questioning or critiquing your overall football knowledge, because you've been spewing bad take after bad take since August. 

     

    Find me one other person in the world who thinks Damien Williams would have gotten a "Dalvin Cook workload" without McCoy on the roster. I'll wait.

     

     You know what's funny is, you keep talking about how Darrel and Darwin are "backup material" like Damien is just soooo much better than they are. Is that why Damien has been a backup his entire career?

     I don't care what you say anymore man. I'm perfectly fine with having a debate with someone who can carry an adult, mature conversation, but when someone resorts to petty insults that all goes out the window. Your opinion means nothing to me when you can't say it without needlessly trashing me. And you've gotten just as much wrong as I have, so don't act like you're the king of fantasy football. That RB you said was going to cut into Montgomery's carries? Got cut this week. What are Dante Pettis's numbers again? Didn't someone try to tell you he wasn't the WR1 anymore? Consider yourself ceremoniously blocked, because I'm done arguing with you. Waste of my time, waste of yours, waste of everyone else's. Moving on.

     lol you are out of your mind. completely.

    you have been nonstop terrible take after terrible take.

     

    i said montgomery had a high likelihood of being a bust because mike davis was going to rob touches from him.

    and hey guess what, thats exactly what happened. montgomery was a 4th rounder.

     

    and you said dante pettis WAS GOING TO BE CUT lol

    of all the players i hyped up this summer you will find me mentioning pettis exactly zero times

     

    you are one sad mofo man.....

     I said he COULD get cut. At least get it right if you're going to continue to take needless shots at me. Also, Montgomery is picking up pace. He's the only rosterable player on that offense at this point in standard leagues. You're calling me sad? You're bullying a random guy on the internet, for what, fun? To make you feel better about yourself? Don't care, I'm done with it. 

     what's this, the third time you're done arguing in the last 24 hours?

     

    you say ignorant sht and you will get called for it. you know, sht like, damien williams is an RB1 i will shout it from the rooftops, damien williams would have a dalvin cook workload if mccoy wasnt on the roster, dante pettis is going to get cut, and about a zillion other things in the last few months.

     

    since my takes are just as bad as yours, why dont you go back and find some of the things ive said that were wrong and quote them here... when i get about 4 hours of free time i'll do the same for your garbage ass takes... im sure this will work out just great for you

    Posted in: Sports Discussion
  • posted a message on Fantasy Football Advice
    Quote from TheMaddenGuru24 >>
    Quote from deweydecimaled >>
    Quote from TheMaddenGuru24 >>
    Quote from deweydecimaled >>
    Quote from TheMaddenGuru24 >>
    Quote from DarkPassenger >>
    Quote from TheMaddenGuru24 >>
    Quote from DarkPassenger >>

    I dont think Williams was a bad pick, but for his ADP...people were really overvaluing him. No way should he have been touched in the first 50 picks. Hes still a 50% touch guy in an explosive offense so he has value but he was never gonna be the RB1 some thought hed be.

     Williams was far from a bad pick back before McCoy came to KC. Dude would have clearly gotten the lions share without him there. Granted, it does look like McCoy seems to be in the doghouse right about now after all the fumbles. So we'll see how that goes.

     If he was taken in the top 50, I think he was a bad pick.

     With McCoy sure, without him, he would have gotten all the carries he's gotten this season, plus 98% of the ones McCoy has gotten. It's clear Darrel and Thompson are non factors currently.  Certainly far from a bad pick in the top 50 if it wasn't for McCoy imo. That's the first 4-5 rounds. 

     they'll use darrel a fair amount if either damien or mccoy goes down, which is what they have already done this season.

     

    there's no foreseeable situation in which damien williams will get around 80% of carries in this offense, mccoy or no mccoy. so no, damien will not get 98% of mccoy's carries if mccoy misses a game. damien will not get a "dalvin cook workload" or whatever you said. you have a real bad read on this offense but I think it's just so you feel like less of a bad NFL football prognosticator. 

     You can simply knock it off with the petty insults dude. I'm getting tired of it.

     

    Before McCoy came onto the scene, Reid mentioned he was going to run a committee similar to the one he used in Philly (we've heard this before, right). In that committee, there was one main back who got the majority of carries, with other backs serving as supporting roles. Damien is no star, but Darrel Williams is straight up backup material, and Thompson is still getting his feet wet. This is not the case for McCoy, and Reid's plans obviously changed. Williams outpaced McCoy in carries these past two weeks 19 to 12, and was on the field this past week for 72% of offensive snaps compared to McCoy's 10%. But at the same time, McCoy received the majority in week 6, 50% to 38%. There is clearly not a main back in this backfield like there would have been without McCoy. Williams was also signed to an extension last year, so they definitely intended on using him. Keep in mind that he was clearly the main back last year at the end when McCoy wasn't there. Overall, there is very much evidence that he could have gotten a large workload would McCoy have not joined the team just as much as there is evidence that it would have been more balanced. So we can agree to disagree, but you simply can't come out here and say that there is no way that it would have happened. To be honest, I'm at fault for acting like it definitely would have happened above as well. None of us truly know, or will ever know. But I don't need you questioning or critiquing my overall football knowledge, thank you.

     a) Oh no!

     

    b) You're right - you don't need me questioning or critiquing your overall football knowledge, because you've been spewing bad take after bad take since August. 

     

    Find me one other person in the world who thinks Damien Williams would have gotten a "Dalvin Cook workload" without McCoy on the roster. I'll wait.

     

     You know what's funny is, you keep talking about how Darrel and Darwin are "backup material" like Damien is just soooo much better than they are. Is that why Damien has been a backup his entire career?

     I don't care what you say anymore man. I'm perfectly fine with having a debate with someone who can carry an adult, mature conversation, but when someone resorts to petty insults that all goes out the window. Your opinion means nothing to me when you can't say it without needlessly trashing me. And you've gotten just as much wrong as I have, so don't act like you're the king of fantasy football. That RB you said was going to cut into Montgomery's carries? Got cut this week. What are Dante Pettis's numbers again? Didn't someone try to tell you he wasn't the WR1 anymore? Consider yourself ceremoniously blocked, because I'm done arguing with you. Waste of my time, waste of yours, waste of everyone else's. Moving on.

     lol you are out of your mind. completely.

    you have been nonstop terrible take after terrible take.

     

    i said montgomery had a high likelihood of being a bust because mike davis was going to rob touches from him.

    and hey guess what, thats exactly what happened. montgomery was a 4th rounder.

     

    and you said dante pettis WAS GOING TO BE CUT lol

    of all the players i hyped up this summer you will find me mentioning pettis exactly zero times

     

    you are one sad mofo man.....

    Posted in: Sports Discussion
  • posted a message on Fantasy Football Advice

    Here is my lineup tomorrow for my big 12 team redraft league i've been in for about a decade.

    would you like to go up against it this week

     

    Posted in: Sports Discussion
  • posted a message on Fantasy Football Advice
    Quote from deweydecimaled >>
    Quote from mrnfl123 >>

    Rank these QBs for tomorrow 

    Tannehill, Darnold, Mayfield, Trubisky, Hoyer, Allen, Rudolph

     dang

     

    tannehill, darnold, hoyer, allen, rudolph/mayfield

     

     

     

    ....

     

     

     

    trubisky

     here's pat thorman's for this week

     

    # PLAYER (TEAM) MATCHUP ECR™ VS. ECR
    1 Lamar Jackson (BAL)
     
    at CIN 1 0
    2 Patrick Mahomes (KC)
     
    at TEN 4 +2
    3 Jameis Winston (TB)
     
    vs. ARI 3 0
    4 Drew Brees (NO)
     
    vs. ATL 2 -2
    5 Kyler Murray (ARI)
     
    at TB 5 0
    6 Aaron Rodgers (GB)
     
    vs. CAR 6 0
    7 Russell Wilson (SEA)
     
    at SF 8 +1
    8 Dak Prescott (DAL)
     
    vs. MIN 7 -1
    9 Philip Rivers (LAC)
     
    at OAK 9 0
    10 Matt Ryan (ATL)
     
    at NO 10 0
    11 Daniel Jones (NYG)
     
    at NYJ 15 +4
    12 Matthew Stafford (DET)
     
    at CHI 13 +1
    13 Jared Goff (LAR)
     
    at PIT 14 +1
    14 Josh Allen (BUF)
     
    at CLE 11 -3
    15 Jimmy Garoppolo (SF)
     
    vs. SEA 12 -3
    16 Ryan Tannehill (TEN)
     
    vs. KC 18 +2
    17 Derek Carr (OAK)
     
    vs. LAC 16 -1
    18 Brian Hoyer (IND)
     
    vs. MIA 20 +2
    19 Kirk Cousins (MIN)
     
    at DAL 17 -2
    20 Mitch Trubisky (CHI)
     
    vs. DET 21 +1
    21 Sam Darnold (NYJ)
     
    vs. NYG 19 -2
    22 Baker Mayfield (CLE)
     
    vs. BUF 24 +2
    23 Kyle Allen (CAR)
     
    at GB 23 0
    24 Mason Rudolph (PIT)
     
    vs. LAR 25 +1
    25 Ryan Fitzpatrick (MIA)
     
    at IND 22 -3
    26 Ryan Finley (CIN)
     
    vs. BAL 26 0
    27 Taysom Hill (NO)
     
    vs. ATL 27 0
    28 Josh Rosen (MIA)
     
    at IND 31 +3
    29 Matt Moore (KC)
     
    at TEN 28 -1
    30 Andy Dalton (CIN)
     
    vs. BAL 29 -1
    31 Marcus Mariota (TEN)
     
    vs. KC 30 -1
    32 Robert Griffin (BAL)
     
    at CIN 33 +1
    33 Chad Kelly (IND)
     
    vs. MIA 38 +5
    34 Eli Manning (NYG)
     
    at NYJ 32 -2
    35 Matt Barkley (BUF)
     
    at CLE 34 -1
    36 Teddy Bridgewater (NO)
     
    vs. ATL 35 -1
    37 Nick Mullens (SF)
     
    vs. SEA 37 0
    Posted in: Sports Discussion
  • posted a message on Fantasy Football Advice
    Quote from mrnfl123 >>

    Rank these QBs for tomorrow 

    Tannehill, Darnold, Mayfield, Trubisky, Hoyer, Allen, Rudolph

     dang

     

    tannehill, darnold, hoyer, allen, rudolph/mayfield

     

     

     

    ....

     

     

     

    trubisky

     

    (pretty sure you meant kyle allen)

    Posted in: Sports Discussion
  • posted a message on NFL Discussion: Week 10
    Quote from Hitmanhavoc >>
    Quote from gametyme89 >>

    Even at full strength it's not a guarantee that one of those teams win over the other. That's a coin toss game in my opinion. Could easily go either way at full strength.

     I agree for sure 

     yeah probably will come down to a field goal make or miss or something marginal

    def should be one of the better games this week

    nothing really jumping off the page this week

    arizona tampa should be high scoring but it's essentially an exhibition these teams have nothing to play for

    panthers packers? eh?

    those are pretty much the only 2 interesting matchups until SNF

    lot of lopsided matchups

    giants jets? i mean... at least that's not lopsided... woof

     

    but hey, one of the best MNF's of the season so far 

    Posted in: Sports Discussion
  • posted a message on NFL Discussion: Week 10

    "Wow kittle doubtful for the game, niners taking a big hit I can’t see them winning this game "

     

    sounds like

     

    "kittle's out so the 49ers can't win"

    Posted in: Sports Discussion
  • posted a message on Fantasy Football Advice
    Quote from TheMaddenGuru24 >>
    Quote from deweydecimaled >>
    Quote from TheMaddenGuru24 >>
    Quote from DarkPassenger >>
    Quote from TheMaddenGuru24 >>
    Quote from DarkPassenger >>

    I dont think Williams was a bad pick, but for his ADP...people were really overvaluing him. No way should he have been touched in the first 50 picks. Hes still a 50% touch guy in an explosive offense so he has value but he was never gonna be the RB1 some thought hed be.

     Williams was far from a bad pick back before McCoy came to KC. Dude would have clearly gotten the lions share without him there. Granted, it does look like McCoy seems to be in the doghouse right about now after all the fumbles. So we'll see how that goes.

     If he was taken in the top 50, I think he was a bad pick.

     With McCoy sure, without him, he would have gotten all the carries he's gotten this season, plus 98% of the ones McCoy has gotten. It's clear Darrel and Thompson are non factors currently.  Certainly far from a bad pick in the top 50 if it wasn't for McCoy imo. That's the first 4-5 rounds. 

     they'll use darrel a fair amount if either damien or mccoy goes down, which is what they have already done this season.

     

    there's no foreseeable situation in which damien williams will get around 80% of carries in this offense, mccoy or no mccoy. so no, damien will not get 98% of mccoy's carries if mccoy misses a game. damien will not get a "dalvin cook workload" or whatever you said. you have a real bad read on this offense but I think it's just so you feel like less of a bad NFL football prognosticator. 

     You can simply knock it off with the petty insults dude. I'm getting tired of it.

     

    Before McCoy came onto the scene, Reid mentioned he was going to run a committee similar to the one he used in Philly (we've heard this before, right). In that committee, there was one main back who got the majority of carries, with other backs serving as supporting roles. Damien is no star, but Darrel Williams is straight up backup material, and Thompson is still getting his feet wet. This is not the case for McCoy, and Reid's plans obviously changed. Williams outpaced McCoy in carries these past two weeks 19 to 12, and was on the field this past week for 72% of offensive snaps compared to McCoy's 10%. But at the same time, McCoy received the majority in week 6, 50% to 38%. There is clearly not a main back in this backfield like there would have been without McCoy. Williams was also signed to an extension last year, so they definitely intended on using him. Keep in mind that he was clearly the main back last year at the end when McCoy wasn't there. Overall, there is very much evidence that he could have gotten a large workload would McCoy have not joined the team just as much as there is evidence that it would have been more balanced. So we can agree to disagree, but you simply can't come out here and say that there is no way that it would have happened. To be honest, I'm at fault for acting like it definitely would have happened above as well. None of us truly know, or will ever know. But I don't need you questioning or critiquing my overall football knowledge, thank you.

     a) Oh no!

     

    b) You're right - you don't need me questioning or critiquing your overall football knowledge, because you've been spewing bad take after bad take since August. 

     

    Find me one other person in the world who thinks Damien Williams would have gotten a "Dalvin Cook workload" without McCoy on the roster. I'll wait.

     

     You know what's funny is, you keep talking about how Darrel and Darwin are "backup material" like Damien is just soooo much better than they are. Is that why Damien has been a backup his entire career?

    Posted in: Sports Discussion
  • posted a message on NFL Discussion: Week 10
    Quote from Chasej3553 >>

     PFF is usually BS. If Russ isnt #1, its not even worth looking at the list. 

     what's strange is, if you read the blurb on russell, it's glowing, there's nothing negative, and it reads like the guy who should be #1. he's like best rated at everything.

    then you read brees and mahomes at 1 and 2 and there's something negative in there for both of them IIRC

    so ... uh.... wtf?

    Posted in: Sports Discussion
  • posted a message on NFL Discussion: Week 10
    Quote from Chasej3553 >>
    Quote from LBJ >>
    Quote from Chasej3553 >>

    Wow kittle doubtful for the game, niners taking a big hit I can’t see them winning this game 

     They have the #1 defense in the league..

     What is ur point? They didn’t look so good last game against the cardinals and now are missing kwon and kittle, that’s a big hit and they’re going up against the Seahawks who I believe will win.

     kittle hasn't topped 57 yards the last 3 weeks. he's only topped 86 yards once this season. he has TWO touchdowns. you are greatly exaggerating his importance. yes he is an awesome blocker too. if he doesnt play - BTW he hasn't been ruled out yet - that's not an automatic loss for the 49ers. pretty weird take

    Posted in: Sports Discussion
  • posted a message on NFL Discussion: Week 10
    Quote from DarkPassenger >>

    Will this Chase Young situation affect his #1 pick status? Assuming a non QB team has the first pick that is.

     

    The whole thing just shows the NCAA is a joke. Hes being suspended for borrowing money, which he paid back in full, from a friend his freshman year. 

     

    So I don't think teams will dock him for character concerns or anything but will less tape harm him? The dude is insane so I don't think it will at all. Still wonder if this will affect his draft stock at all.

     just another example of the ncaa being punitive for a minor infraction to keep up the illusion that they don't know that pay for play is rampant in major programs.

    have a connection who was at florida the year before urban came in and afterwards... everyone on the team got an envelope on friday. more high profile players got bigger envelopes. not sure if this is common knowledge but they had aaron hernandez rooming with tebow to try and straighten him out

     

    at this point if anyone thinks the ncaa only has isolated incidents of pay for play i dont think youre paying attention or you dont want to see it. blue chip freshman declares, next time you see him on tv in an interview etc suddenly hes wearing 10k in jewelry. amazing!

     

    Posted in: Sports Discussion
  • posted a message on HEAT!!

    Rippa..........you just need to let your guard down and feel the heat

     

    Posted in: Sports Discussion
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.