• posted a message on NFL Discussion: Chiefs Super Bowl Champions!!!
    Quote from DarkPassenger >>

    The chef analogy is arguably my favorite and one I use the most. 

     

    Basically just means you're allowed to have you're opinion.

     Ok now I know lol

    Posted in: Sports Discussion
  • posted a message on NFL Discussion: Chiefs Super Bowl Champions!!!
    Quote from DarkPassenger >>
    Quote from Da_Rippa808 >>
    Quote from DarkPassenger >>

    Is no one allowed to have an opinion in this thread anymore? Like damn bruh 

     This escalated so quickly lol.

     

    All I said was I dont think Taysom is a franchise guy

     I apologize for the guru comment. I just saw your comment as a sarcastic type of remark/analogy in response to the statement I provided. And you know what happens when someone gets in my cross hairs. Truce?

     You're on think fucking ice buddy

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Troll 😂😂

     Don’t leave me on the sinking ship that is the old.muthead forum

    Posted in: Sports Discussion
  • posted a message on NFL Discussion: Chiefs Super Bowl Champions!!!
    Quote from bruinrogue >>
    Quote from DarkPassenger >>

    Except it wasnt a smart ass comment. It was a super simple and common analogy. 

     

    I'm not a chef but I still have opinions on food

     

    I'm not the Saints GM but I still have opinions on Hill.

     And even if you aren't the Saints GM, GM's are still pretty damn stupid at times. 

     I was referring to the organization as a whole. Coaching staff and Payton included. 

    Posted in: Sports Discussion
  • posted a message on NFL Discussion: Chiefs Super Bowl Champions!!!
    Quote from DarkPassenger >>

    Is no one allowed to have an opinion in this thread anymore? Like damn bruh 

     This escalated so quickly lol.

     

    All I said was I dont think Taysom is a franchise guy

     I apologize for the guru comment. I just saw your comment as a sarcastic type of remark/analogy in response to the statement I provided. And you know what happens when someone gets in my cross hairs. Truce?

    Posted in: Sports Discussion
  • posted a message on NFL Discussion: Chiefs Super Bowl Champions!!!
    Quote from DarkPassenger >>
    Quote from Da_Rippa808 >>
    Quote from DarkPassenger >>
    Quote from Da_Rippa808 >>
    Quote from DarkPassenger >>
    Quote from Da_Rippa808 >>
    Quote from DarkPassenger >>
    Quote from Da_Rippa808 >>
    Quote from DarkPassenger >>
    Quote from Da_Rippa808 >>
    Quote from DarkPassenger >>
    Quote from Da_Rippa808 >>
    Quote from DarkPassenger >>

    Sanu shouldnt be a QB. That's my point. 

     

    Those guys are going to be the future because they were star QBs and they're young.

     

    Who knows, maybe Taysom will be good, but I dont think so. Turning your franchise over to a 31 year QB with little experience and 13 career passes sounds pretty foolish to me.

     That’s where Namith’s point kills your argument. Rookies have zero passes coming into the league and are considered franchise QBs having thrown no passes. And u can’t say you’ve seen what Hill can do because he hasn’t shown it yet. 

     I responded to that. Rookies are considered franchise QBs because they are young and they were star QBs. Taysom is neither. 

     

    I never said I've seen what Hill can do. But at the same time if you criticize me for saying he wont be good even though we havent seen him, doesnt that mean the people who say he is a franchise guy even though they havent seen him should be criticized as well?

     Give me a guy who has had been with the team for years and actually has some experience + learning from one of the GOATs in the game + one of the best offensive coaches in the league over an unproven star college qb. 

     

    And I agree that the ppl saying he is a franchise qb should be criticized, they have no clue either. I’m going with the franchise’s decision since they obviously know what they’re doing or have an idea on Hill’s future potential. 

     Chefs understand food better than I do. I still know when something tastes bad.

     Is this guru?

     Good one.

     Serious question. Assuming you know more than the saints franchise regarding hill is pretty ridiculous 

     Yes. I have an opinion on a player. Damn I'm ridiculous. Only people within the organization can have opinions on players. What a fool i am for thinking for myself.

     You mistake an opinion for a concrete statement at this point. You saying you still know when something tastes bad shows that. 

     

    don’t get sarcastic with me Colton, I’m just calling u out for your know-it-all attitude in this conversation. 

     You're going full rippa rn. I said multiple times maybe I'm wrong. Maybe he will be good. You're choosing to only see your side and ignoring the fact that I said at least twice maybe I'm wrong. I constantly said I think, not I know.

     

    Weird definition for concrete statement.

     Your last statement u directly say you know the food tastes bad aka you know Taysom hill is not a franchise qb. I have no argument on whether u think he will be or not, but it’s smart ass comments like that, that make it seem like u disregard opposing views and are a know it all (like someone else in here we know). That’s all I’m saying. 

     Yeah you completely misinterpreted the point. 

     

    The point is just because you're not in that profession doesnt mean your opinion is wrong. 

     

    You essentially said since I'm not with the Saints then I have no idea what I'm talking about so my opinion is invalid. 

     

    I'm not a chef. I still know what food tastes like.

     We are both misunderstanding each other it seems. I’m in no way saying you have no right to an opinion or that just because you aren’t with the saints, you’re opinion is invalid. All I said was the organization has a much better idea of his future potential and possibility of being their next franchise qb over you or me, or anyone not in their organization. Because Brees is among the best QBs to ever play the game, if they go with hill, you have to give them the benefit of the doubt. They wont replace him with someone they don’t view as such since it’s the future of their franchise. 

    Posted in: Sports Discussion
  • posted a message on NFL Discussion: Chiefs Super Bowl Champions!!!
    Quote from dolphaholic >>
    Quote from Da_Rippa808 >>
    Quote from DarkPassenger >>
    Quote from Da_Rippa808 >>
    Quote from DarkPassenger >>
    Quote from Da_Rippa808 >>
    Quote from DarkPassenger >>
    Quote from Da_Rippa808 >>
    Quote from DarkPassenger >>
    Quote from Da_Rippa808 >>
    Quote from DarkPassenger >>
    Quote from Da_Rippa808 >>
    Quote from DarkPassenger >>

    Sanu shouldnt be a QB. That's my point. 

     

    Those guys are going to be the future because they were star QBs and they're young.

     

    Who knows, maybe Taysom will be good, but I dont think so. Turning your franchise over to a 31 year QB with little experience and 13 career passes sounds pretty foolish to me.

     That’s where Namith’s point kills your argument. Rookies have zero passes coming into the league and are considered franchise QBs having thrown no passes. And u can’t say you’ve seen what Hill can do because he hasn’t shown it yet. 

     I responded to that. Rookies are considered franchise QBs because they are young and they were star QBs. Taysom is neither. 

     

    I never said I've seen what Hill can do. But at the same time if you criticize me for saying he wont be good even though we havent seen him, doesnt that mean the people who say he is a franchise guy even though they havent seen him should be criticized as well?

     Give me a guy who has had been with the team for years and actually has some experience + learning from one of the GOATs in the game + one of the best offensive coaches in the league over an unproven star college qb. 

     

    And I agree that the ppl saying he is a franchise qb should be criticized, they have no clue either. I’m going with the franchise’s decision since they obviously know what they’re doing or have an idea on Hill’s future potential. 

     Chefs understand food better than I do. I still know when something tastes bad.

     Is this guru?

     Good one.

     Serious question. Assuming you know more than the saints franchise regarding hill is pretty ridiculous 

     Yes. I have an opinion on a player. Damn I'm ridiculous. Only people within the organization can have opinions on players. What a fool i am for thinking for myself.

     You mistake an opinion for a concrete statement at this point. You saying you still know when something tastes bad shows that. 

     

    don’t get sarcastic with me Colton, I’m just calling u out for your know-it-all attitude in this conversation. 

     You're going full rippa rn. I said multiple times maybe I'm wrong. Maybe he will be good. You're choosing to only see your side and ignoring the fact that I said at least twice maybe I'm wrong. I constantly said I think, not I know.

     

    Weird definition for concrete statement.

     Your last statement u directly say you know the food tastes bad aka you know Taysom hill is not a franchise qb. I have no argument on whether u think he will be or not, but it’s smart ass comments like that, that make it seem like u disregard opposing views and are a know it all (like someone else in here we know). That’s all I’m saying. 

     this is what's so annoying about you. you take one little thing that someone says and run them into the ground. you never let it go. namtih and colton are having a civil conversation until you come in and say something condescending like "is this guru". you're so toxic.

     Fair enough. That guru line was me irritatingly responding to a comment I felt was a smart ass comment. 

    Posted in: Sports Discussion
  • posted a message on NFL Discussion: Chiefs Super Bowl Champions!!!
    Quote from DarkPassenger >>
    Quote from Da_Rippa808 >>
    Quote from DarkPassenger >>
    Quote from Da_Rippa808 >>
    Quote from DarkPassenger >>
    Quote from Da_Rippa808 >>
    Quote from DarkPassenger >>
    Quote from Da_Rippa808 >>
    Quote from DarkPassenger >>
    Quote from Da_Rippa808 >>
    Quote from DarkPassenger >>

    Sanu shouldnt be a QB. That's my point. 

     

    Those guys are going to be the future because they were star QBs and they're young.

     

    Who knows, maybe Taysom will be good, but I dont think so. Turning your franchise over to a 31 year QB with little experience and 13 career passes sounds pretty foolish to me.

     That’s where Namith’s point kills your argument. Rookies have zero passes coming into the league and are considered franchise QBs having thrown no passes. And u can’t say you’ve seen what Hill can do because he hasn’t shown it yet. 

     I responded to that. Rookies are considered franchise QBs because they are young and they were star QBs. Taysom is neither. 

     

    I never said I've seen what Hill can do. But at the same time if you criticize me for saying he wont be good even though we havent seen him, doesnt that mean the people who say he is a franchise guy even though they havent seen him should be criticized as well?

     Give me a guy who has had been with the team for years and actually has some experience + learning from one of the GOATs in the game + one of the best offensive coaches in the league over an unproven star college qb. 

     

    And I agree that the ppl saying he is a franchise qb should be criticized, they have no clue either. I’m going with the franchise’s decision since they obviously know what they’re doing or have an idea on Hill’s future potential. 

     Chefs understand food better than I do. I still know when something tastes bad.

     Is this guru?

     Good one.

     Serious question. Assuming you know more than the saints franchise regarding hill is pretty ridiculous 

     Yes. I have an opinion on a player. Damn I'm ridiculous. Only people within the organization can have opinions on players. What a fool i am for thinking for myself.

     You mistake an opinion for a concrete statement at this point. You saying you still know when something tastes bad shows that. 

     

    don’t get sarcastic with me Colton, I’m just calling u out for your know-it-all attitude in this conversation. 

     You're going full rippa rn. I said multiple times maybe I'm wrong. Maybe he will be good. You're choosing to only see your side and ignoring the fact that I said at least twice maybe I'm wrong. I constantly said I think, not I know.

     

    Weird definition for concrete statement.

     Your last statement u directly say you know the food tastes bad aka you know Taysom hill is not a franchise qb. I have no argument on whether u think he will be or not, but it’s smart ass comments like that, that make it seem like u disregard opposing views and are a know it all (like someone else in here we know). That’s all I’m saying. 

    Posted in: Sports Discussion
  • posted a message on NFL Discussion: Chiefs Super Bowl Champions!!!

    Wilson x Olsen 👀

     Assuming he doesn’t get hurt like he does every season

    Posted in: Sports Discussion
  • posted a message on NFL Discussion: Chiefs Super Bowl Champions!!!
    Quote from DarkPassenger >>
    Quote from Da_Rippa808 >>
    Quote from DarkPassenger >>
    Quote from Da_Rippa808 >>
    Quote from DarkPassenger >>
    Quote from Da_Rippa808 >>
    Quote from DarkPassenger >>
    Quote from Da_Rippa808 >>
    Quote from DarkPassenger >>

    Sanu shouldnt be a QB. That's my point. 

     

    Those guys are going to be the future because they were star QBs and they're young.

     

    Who knows, maybe Taysom will be good, but I dont think so. Turning your franchise over to a 31 year QB with little experience and 13 career passes sounds pretty foolish to me.

     That’s where Namith’s point kills your argument. Rookies have zero passes coming into the league and are considered franchise QBs having thrown no passes. And u can’t say you’ve seen what Hill can do because he hasn’t shown it yet. 

     I responded to that. Rookies are considered franchise QBs because they are young and they were star QBs. Taysom is neither. 

     

    I never said I've seen what Hill can do. But at the same time if you criticize me for saying he wont be good even though we havent seen him, doesnt that mean the people who say he is a franchise guy even though they havent seen him should be criticized as well?

     Give me a guy who has had been with the team for years and actually has some experience + learning from one of the GOATs in the game + one of the best offensive coaches in the league over an unproven star college qb. 

     

    And I agree that the ppl saying he is a franchise qb should be criticized, they have no clue either. I’m going with the franchise’s decision since they obviously know what they’re doing or have an idea on Hill’s future potential. 

     Chefs understand food better than I do. I still know when something tastes bad.

     Is this guru?

     Good one.

     Serious question. Assuming you know more than the saints franchise regarding hill is pretty ridiculous 

     Yes. I have an opinion on a player. Damn I'm ridiculous. Only people within the organization can have opinions on players. What a fool i am for thinking for myself.

     You mistake an opinion for a concrete statement at this point. You saying you still know when something tastes bad shows that. 

     

    don’t get sarcastic with me Colton, I’m just calling u out for your know-it-all attitude in this conversation. 

    Posted in: Sports Discussion
  • posted a message on NFL Discussion: Chiefs Super Bowl Champions!!!
    Quote from DarkPassenger >>
    Quote from Da_Rippa808 >>
    Quote from DarkPassenger >>
    Quote from Da_Rippa808 >>
    Quote from DarkPassenger >>
    Quote from Da_Rippa808 >>
    Quote from DarkPassenger >>

    Sanu shouldnt be a QB. That's my point. 

     

    Those guys are going to be the future because they were star QBs and they're young.

     

    Who knows, maybe Taysom will be good, but I dont think so. Turning your franchise over to a 31 year QB with little experience and 13 career passes sounds pretty foolish to me.

     That’s where Namith’s point kills your argument. Rookies have zero passes coming into the league and are considered franchise QBs having thrown no passes. And u can’t say you’ve seen what Hill can do because he hasn’t shown it yet. 

     I responded to that. Rookies are considered franchise QBs because they are young and they were star QBs. Taysom is neither. 

     

    I never said I've seen what Hill can do. But at the same time if you criticize me for saying he wont be good even though we havent seen him, doesnt that mean the people who say he is a franchise guy even though they havent seen him should be criticized as well?

     Give me a guy who has had been with the team for years and actually has some experience + learning from one of the GOATs in the game + one of the best offensive coaches in the league over an unproven star college qb. 

     

    And I agree that the ppl saying he is a franchise qb should be criticized, they have no clue either. I’m going with the franchise’s decision since they obviously know what they’re doing or have an idea on Hill’s future potential. 

     Chefs understand food better than I do. I still know when something tastes bad.

     Is this guru?

     Good one.

     Serious question. Assuming you know more than the saints franchise regarding hill is pretty ridiculous 

    Posted in: Sports Discussion
  • posted a message on NFL Discussion: Chiefs Super Bowl Champions!!!
    Quote from DarkPassenger >>
    Quote from Da_Rippa808 >>
    Quote from DarkPassenger >>
    Quote from Da_Rippa808 >>
    Quote from DarkPassenger >>

    Sanu shouldnt be a QB. That's my point. 

     

    Those guys are going to be the future because they were star QBs and they're young.

     

    Who knows, maybe Taysom will be good, but I dont think so. Turning your franchise over to a 31 year QB with little experience and 13 career passes sounds pretty foolish to me.

     That’s where Namith’s point kills your argument. Rookies have zero passes coming into the league and are considered franchise QBs having thrown no passes. And u can’t say you’ve seen what Hill can do because he hasn’t shown it yet. 

     I responded to that. Rookies are considered franchise QBs because they are young and they were star QBs. Taysom is neither. 

     

    I never said I've seen what Hill can do. But at the same time if you criticize me for saying he wont be good even though we havent seen him, doesnt that mean the people who say he is a franchise guy even though they havent seen him should be criticized as well?

     Give me a guy who has had been with the team for years and actually has some experience + learning from one of the GOATs in the game + one of the best offensive coaches in the league over an unproven star college qb. 

     

    And I agree that the ppl saying he is a franchise qb should be criticized, they have no clue either. I’m going with the franchise’s decision since they obviously know what they’re doing or have an idea on Hill’s future potential. 

     Chefs understand food better than I do. I still know when something tastes bad.

     Is this guru?

    Posted in: Sports Discussion
  • posted a message on NFL Discussion: Chiefs Super Bowl Champions!!!
    Quote from DarkPassenger >>
    Quote from Da_Rippa808 >>
    Quote from DarkPassenger >>

    Sanu shouldnt be a QB. That's my point. 

     

    Those guys are going to be the future because they were star QBs and they're young.

     

    Who knows, maybe Taysom will be good, but I dont think so. Turning your franchise over to a 31 year QB with little experience and 13 career passes sounds pretty foolish to me.

     That’s where Namith’s point kills your argument. Rookies have zero passes coming into the league and are considered franchise QBs having thrown no passes. And u can’t say you’ve seen what Hill can do because he hasn’t shown it yet. 

     I responded to that. Rookies are considered franchise QBs because they are young and they were star QBs. Taysom is neither. 

     

    I never said I've seen what Hill can do. But at the same time if you criticize me for saying he wont be good even though we havent seen him, doesnt that mean the people who say he is a franchise guy even though they havent seen him should be criticized as well?

     Give me a guy who has had been with the team for years and actually has some experience + learning from one of the GOATs in the game + one of the best offensive coaches in the league over an unproven star college qb. 

     

    And I agree that the ppl saying he is a franchise qb should be criticized, they have no clue either. I’m going with the franchise’s decision since they obviously know what they’re doing or have an idea on Hill’s future potential. 

    Posted in: Sports Discussion
  • posted a message on Official NBA Discussion-Kobe Tribute on Page 1
    Quote from saadmurt >>

    Reggie Jackson to the Clippers. Holy fuck this is crazy. Absolutely loved Reggie Jackson in his last OKC yrs and beginning of his Piston chapter. Don't really need him but will be good for depth and give Shammet a breather before he has to carry the team again

     How the hell can they afford all of these guys? Pay cuts?

    Posted in: Sports Discussion
  • posted a message on NFL Discussion: Chiefs Super Bowl Champions!!!
    Quote from DarkPassenger >>

    Sanu shouldnt be a QB. That's my point. 

     

    Those guys are going to be the future because they were star QBs and they're young.

     

    Who knows, maybe Taysom will be good, but I dont think so. Turning your franchise over to a 31 year QB with little experience and 13 career passes sounds pretty foolish to me.

     That’s where Namith’s point kills your argument. Rookies have zero passes coming into the league and are considered franchise QBs having thrown no passes. And u can’t say you’ve seen what Hill can do because he hasn’t shown it yet. 

    Posted in: Sports Discussion
  • posted a message on NFL Discussion: Chiefs Super Bowl Champions!!!

    I think everyone is being way too premature about Hill. Sure he hasn’t shown much as a qb, but don’t forget that he’s been with the team for years now and only they know his true ability as a future qb. Everyone here saying he is or isn’t a franchise qb will not know more about his potential then the actual team themselves, so if they believe he will be the future qb, I trust their opinion. 

    Posted in: Sports Discussion
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.